Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Iran J Basic Med Sci ; 25(6): 762-766, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1934866

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Early, specific, and sensitive detection methods of COVID-19 are essential for force stopping its worldwide infection. Although CT images of the lung and/or viral RNA extraction followed by real-time reverse-transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) are widely used; they have some limitations. Here, we developed a highly sensitive magnetic bead-based viral RNA extraction assay followed by rRT-PCR. Materials and Methods: Case group included oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal and blood samples from 30 patients diagnosed positive by PCR test for COVID-19 and control group included 30 same samples from COVID-19 negative PCR test individuals. RNA was extracted, using viral RNA extraction kit as well as using our hand-made capture bead-based technique. A one-step cDNA synthesis and Real Time PCR was conducted. A two-step comparison of the different viral RNA extraction methods for oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal and blood samples was performed. Student t-test was applied with a P<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: In the case group, all 30 mucosal samples extracted either with viral RNA extraction kit or with beads-based assay were COVID-19 positive although in the latter category, Cqs were much lower. Although 43% of plasma samples extracted by bead-based method were found to be positive but no plasma samples extracted with column-based kit were detected positive by Real Time PCR. Conclusion: Bead-based RNA extraction method can reduce RNA loss by its single-tube performance and enhance the test sensitivity. It is also more sensitive to lower viral loads as shown in the detection of blood samples and the lower Cqs of mucosal samples.

2.
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci ; 58(4): 225-241, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-947610

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of the emerging SARS-CoV-2 virus has highlighted the challenges of detecting viral infections, especially in resource-limited settings. The SARS-CoV-2 virus transmission chain is interrupted when screening and diagnosis can be performed on a large scale by identifying asymptomatic or moderately symptomatic patients. Diagnosis of COVID-19 with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has been limited due to inadequate access to complex, expensive equipment and reagents, which has impeded efforts to reduce the spread of virus transmission. Recently, the development of several diagnostic platforms based on the CRISPR-Cas system has reduced the dependence on RT-PCR. The first CRISPR-based diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The biosensing systems have several important features that make them suitable for point-of-care tests, including the speed of design and synthesis of each platform in less than a few days, an assay time of 1-2 h, and the cost of materials and reagents less than one dollar per test. The HUDSON-SHERLOCK and STOPCovid biosensing systems, as field-deployable and rapid diagnostic tests, can detect low-copy viruses in body fluids without nucleic acid extraction and with minimal equipment. In addition, Cas13-based treatment strategies could potentially be an effective antiviral strategy for the prevention and treatment of emerging pandemic viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. In this review, we describe recent advances in CRISPR-based diagnostic platforms with an emphasis on their use in the rapid diagnosis and potential treatment of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Biosensing Techniques/methods , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , CRISPR-Cas Systems/genetics , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
3.
J Transl Med ; 18(1): 412, 2020 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-901889

ABSTRACT

The latest outbreak of pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 presents a significant challenge to global public health and has a major impact on clinical microbiology laboratories. In some situations, such as patients in coma condition, the oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal sampling is seldom feasible, and blood sampling could be an alternative. In the current article, a comprehensive literature search has been conducted for detecting coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using plasma or serum samples. To date, twenty-six studies have used SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in plasma or serum (RNAaemia) to diagnose COVID-19. The pros and cons are discussed in this article. While the detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral load in respiratory specimens is commonly used to diagnose COVID-19, detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA in plasma or serum should not lose sight and it could be considered as an alternative diagnostic approach.


Subject(s)
Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , RNA, Viral/blood , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Humans , Pandemics , Plasma/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/blood , SARS-CoV-2 , Serum/virology , Viral Load
4.
Arch Bone Jt Surg ; 8(Suppl1): 226-230, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-626237

ABSTRACT

Coronaviruses are a group of enveloped viruses with single-stranded non-segmented positive-sense RNA genomes. In December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 appeared in China for the first time and quickly spread throughout the world. Although certain medications suggested for other afflictions tend to be potentially effective for curing the infection, there is no approved vaccination or drug available for this virus yet. Comprehension of the disease molecular pathogenesis could provide useful tools for COVID-19 patients in surveillance, prognosis, treatment, vaccine development and therapeutic targeting. The present research aims to summarize the association in COVID-19 patients between molecular dimensions of comorbidities with clinical and preclinical information. Developing an ACE2 inhibitor could be a possible therapeutic target. Plasmin is another possible candidate both in diagnosis and treatment areas. All predicted biomarkers must be validated either through randomized clinical trials or experimental assays before clinical application in patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL